Some ideas are as follows:
1. Touch responsiveness is an objectively measurable quantity. I think high speed cameras can play a very important role in this field.
Some good initial work has been reported by Tech Report.
It is unfortunately increasingly common to hear “Benchmarks don’t matter” and then some semi-coherent rant about user experience and “smooth” UIs. I think all it means is that the writer had no idea how to measure the touch responsiveness 😛
2. Application launch times: Application launch times can again be measured objectively. For slower apps, you can use a stopwatch and for small fast-launching apps, you can again use a high speed camera.
3. Web browsing benchmarks need to go beyond sunspider and browsermark. It is important to show the web page load times of REAL webpages. For reproducible results, webpages from say top 10 common websites (at a given date) should be copied to a local server and then those pages can be tested. Anandtech used to include such benchmarks but for some reason even they have fallen back to just using the meaningless synthetics. Even in synthetics, the test coverage needs to be increased. For Javascript, perhaps tests like the Mozilla Kraken or the new Octane suite should be looked at.
4. Proper application benchmarks need to be more common instead of synthetics. For example, Photoshop Touch can perhaps be used much as Photoshop benchmarks are now common on the desktop.
5. Synthetic benchmarks are poorly written and poorly understood. For example, Linpack Android version seems to be a poorly coded benchmark. The megaflops reported from the benchmark are far off the capabilities of the chips tested. I am looking at making a better one when I get time. For floating point tests, really what you want are accurate and separately reported measures of fp32 performance, fp64 performance and fp32-with-NEON performance.
6. Further, synthetics should  properly report both single threaded and multithreaded numbers. (Linpack does do this but many other benchmarks don’t). I think single-thread performance is underestimated on mobile with most websites reporting benchmarks from multithreaded tests. However, few apps use 4 cores in any modern Android phone. And no, you don’t need 4 cores to multitask.
The Android Linpack benchmark is essentially just a memory bandwidth test. It’s not blocked at all, and it’s running on a JVM. It kills me every time Anand says it’s measuring FP throughput, because it’s doing no such thing. It’d be a great service to the community if you could take an adaptable (cache blocked) BLAS code and make it easy to run as an Android app for these poor misguided web reviewers.
Yes I am looking at that, but the project is on a back-burner for now.